CLOSE
Original image
iStock

Wikipedia Bots Wage Editing Wars That Last for Years

Original image
iStock

Since it launched in 2001, Wikipedia has attracted passionate contributors disputing everything from the height of André the Giant to the spelling of "Brazil." According to a new study published in PLOS One [PDF], artificially intelligent bots make up the site’s most relentless editors. Editing battles between software bots have raged on for years, and sometimes they only end when one party is taken out of commission, The Guardian reports.

For the study, computer scientists from the Oxford Internet Institute and the Alan Turing Institute in London examined bot interactions during Wikipedia’s first decade online. Editing bots have been a vital part of the site’s maintenance since its inception. Every day thousands of bots remove vandalism, correct spelling errors, add links, and complete other general tasks beyond what humans can do alone, and sometimes they cross paths.

When two algorithms contradict one another, they can go on undoing each other's edits for years. Between 2009 and 2010, Xqbot and Darknessbot duked it out over 3629 separate articles. A different battle between the bot Tachikoma and Russbot lasted two years. In that time they changed over 1000 revisions the other had made. Subjects of contention between the two included Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and the UK's demographics. The pages that sparked the most bot-on-bot conflict overall were those for former Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Niels Bohr, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and the Arabic language.

Language also played a large role in the automated edit wars. Portuguese bots were the most combative, reverting the edits of their peers an average of 185 times in 10 years. German bots, on the other hand, only picked editorial fights an average of 24 times over the decade. Bots don’t give in as easily as human editors do, and they also engage in slower battles. People receive instant alerts when someone reverts their edits, while it usually takes bots about a month to see a change that has been made.

Programming AI systems to interact with each other is becoming increasingly important. In January, we got a fascinating peek at what a conversation between two Google Home devices looks like. They were much more civil than the Wikipedia bots—they discussed God, their existence, and eventually made plans to get married.

[h/t The Guardian]

Original image
iStock
arrow
Live Smarter
You Can Now Order Food Through Facebook
Original image
iStock

After a bit of controversy over its way of aggregating news feeds and some questionable content censoring policies, it’s nice to have Facebook roll out a feature everyone can agree on: allowing you to order food without leaving the social media site.

According to a press release, Facebook says that the company decided to begin offering food delivery options after realizing that many of its users come to the social media hub to rate and discuss local eateries. Rather than hop from Facebook to the restaurant or a delivery service, you’ll be able to stay within the app and select from a menu of food choices. Just click “Order Food” from the Explore menu on a desktop interface or under the “More” option on Android or iOS devices. There, you’ll be presented with options that will accept takeout or delivery orders, as well as businesses participating with services like Delivery.com or EatStreet.

If you need to sign up and create an account with Delivery.com or Jimmy John’s, for example, you can do that without leaving Facebook. The feature is expected to be available nationally, effective immediately.

[h/t Forbes]

Original image
iStock
arrow
fun
The Seemingly Simple ‘Math’ Problem That Stumped the Internet
Original image
iStock

If you’re a regular Mental Floss reader, you know that we love a good brain teaser. And the one below, which originated on Facebook and has been shared more than 150,000 times, is a great one to test just how sharp you are on a Friday evening at the end of a long workweek.

It’s a seemingly simple enough task: spot the error. Your time starts now…

We’ll give you a minute …

And a little space for you to scroll down to find the answer …

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Did you figure it out?

The “mistake” is that the word “mistake” is misspelled on the instruction sheet on the left. If you missed that completely, you’re not alone: the grid of numbers is what immediately grabs your attention.

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios