istock / getty images
istock / getty images

12 Adorable (and Hilarious) Kid Reviews of the MoMA

istock / getty images
istock / getty images

Modern art isn’t for everyone. Some people just don’t get it, as evidenced by a few of the comment cards submitted as part of the Museum of Modern Arts “I went to MoMA” project. To date, visitors have uploaded nearly 32,000 comment cards. Some of the best come from children, whose observations of the museum and its art, whether they’re funny or observant, are always priceless.


Visitors to MoMA can enjoy paintings by Andrew Wyeth, Andy Warhol, and Roy Lichtenstein; walk through a sculpture garden; and check out special exhibitions. But none of that impressed Annabelle, a girl from New York, who didn’t see what she expected at the museum—and left a scathing review on a comment card expressing her disappointment: “saw a coat closet trash and two water fountains I’m very disapointed I did not see a dinasour you call your self a museum!”


When Lorenzo came to New York from England, he had a much better time at MoMA than Annabelle. Among some of the more traditional works of art, he also saw the museum’s Tim Burton exhibition: “I saw the stary night and the boggie woogie and the musicians and water lilies and I thought it was good.” He topped off his enthusiastic review with a drawing of a snowman on a cake.


This young reviewer wasn’t so thrilled with MoMA, and wished he’d gone to the Guggenheim, perhaps to check out Piet Mondrian’s Tableau No. 2/Composition No. VII or Salvador Dalí’s Birth of Liquid Desires instead. This is in direct contrast to the unnamed child who left a review saying MoMA was “1,000,000,000,000,000,000 better than the Guggenheim!”


Even art museums can be like playgrounds, at least for this young visitor. This kid wasn’t the only one vomiting: Pat from NYC “saw a baby throw up” on his visit to MoMA.


On her visit to MoMA, Tamara from Vancouver wrote that she “saw amazing artists. It was like a dream! Here is a fish.” And then she drew an aquarium. (Perhaps she was inspired by Paul Klee’s Around the Fish?)


Maia didn’t leave any indication of what she saw when the visited MoMA, but she liked what she saw. “it was butufl,” she declared. “what are you going to have in April! I mite come and see it. it mite be butufl agen.”


Art is about appreciating what’s on a canvas, sure, but it’s also about how you interpret what you see—a lesson Scarlett from Atlanta learned while visiting MoMA. “I saw a big colorful panting,” she wrote on her comment card. “I thought it was bird’s My mom said you can think of it as anything. I also liked the berdmade.”

Of course, not everyone appreciates their mom bringing them to a museum. Solo from Norway wrote that “I went to MoMA and… because MY MOM Made me to it. Now i’m going to eat,” then drew a few waves.


Nobody likes to wait in line, least of all kids. But Dario didn’t seem to mind that much: “The line was long. I was hungry. I was thirsty; so over all it was COOL,” he wrote on his comment card, signing with a big smiley face and a “Dario wuz here.”


Vesko from “Serbia!!!” wrote on a comment card that “I dont like MOMA because I dont understand anything.” Then he crossed out MoMA and wrote “ROFlMAO.”


New York City kid Merlion noted on a comment card  that “My favorite part was when some thing looks creepy.” Perhaps inspired by the museum’s Burton exhibit, the youth drew a creepy person, a creepy heart, and a creepy ghost.


In addition to traditional forms of art like paintings and sculptures, MoMA’s collection includes many objects, ranging from chairs and Apple Computers to a WWII-era helicopter and a Ferrari Formula 1 Racing Car. It was the latter that really thrilled Giles, a New York City student. He said on his comment card that he “saw lots of Diego rivera paintings” on his visit to MoMA, but that “I also saw a really Big Race car” which was “my favorate.”


This young visitor knows you can never have enough Harry Potter exhibits—and one at the MoMA could bring whole new meaning to the phrase “Dark Arts.

Bad Moods Might Make You More Productive

Being in a bad mood at work might not be such a bad thing. New research shows that foul moods can lead to better executive function—the mental processing that handles skills like focus, self-control, creative thinking, mental flexibility, and working memory. But the benefit might hinge on how you go through emotions.

As part of the study, published in Personality and Individual Differences, a pair of psychologists at the University of Waterloo in Canada subjected more than 90 undergraduate students to a battery of tests designed to measure their working memory and inhibition control, two areas of executive function. They also gave the students several questionnaires designed to measure their emotional reactivity and mood over the previous week.

They found that some people who were in slightly bad moods performed significantly better on the working memory and inhibition tasks, but the benefit depended on how the person experienced emotion. Specifically, being in a bit of a bad mood seemed to boost the performance of participants with high emotional reactivity, meaning that they’re sensitive, have intense reactions to situations, and hold on to their feelings for a long time. People with low emotional reactivity performed worse on the tasks when in a bad mood, though.

“Our results show that there are some people for whom a bad mood may actually hone the kind of thinking skills that are important for everyday life,” one of the study’s co-authors, psychology professor Tara McAuley, said in a press statement. Why people with bigger emotional responses experience this boost but people with less-intense emotions don’t is an open question. One hypothesis is that people who have high emotional reactivity are already used to experiencing intense emotions, so they aren’t as fazed by their bad moods. However, more research is necessary to tease out those factors.

[h/t Big Think]

Universal Pictures Home Entertainment
The 10 Wildest Movie Plot Twists
Laura Harring in Mulholland Drive (2001)
Laura Harring in Mulholland Drive (2001)
Universal Pictures Home Entertainment

An ending often makes or breaks a movie. There’s nothing quite as satisfying as having the rug pulled out from under you, particularly in a thriller. But too many flicks that try to shock can’t stick the landing—they’re outlandish and illogical, or signal where the plot is headed. Not all of these films are entirely successful, but they have one important attribute in common: From the classic to the cultishly beloved, they involve hard-to-predict twists that really do blow viewers’ minds, then linger there for days, if not life. (Warning: Massive spoilers below.)

1. PSYCHO (1960)

Alfred Hitchcock often constructed his movies like neat games that manipulated the audience. The Master of Suspense delved headfirst into horror with Psycho, which follows a secretary (Janet Leigh) who sneaks off with $40,000 and hides in a motel. The ensuing jolt depends on Leigh’s fame at the time: No one expected the ostensible star and protagonist to die in a gory (for the time) shower butchering only a third of the way into the running time. Hitchcock outdid that feat with the last-act revelation that Anthony Perkins’s supremely creepy Norman Bates is embodying his dead mother.


No, not the botched Tim Burton remake that tweaked the original movie’s famous reveal in a way that left everyone scratching their heads. The Charlton Heston-starring sci-fi gem continues to stupefy anyone who comes into its orbit. Heston, of course, plays an astronaut who travels to a strange land where advanced apes lord over human slaves. It becomes clear once he finds the decrepit remains of the Statue of Liberty that he’s in fact on a future Earth. The anti-violence message, especially during the political tumult of 1968, shook people up as much as the time warp.

3. DEEP RED (1975)

It’s not rare for a horror movie to flip the script when it comes to unmasking its killer, but it’s much rarer that such a film causes a viewer to question their own perception of the world around them. Such is the case for Deep Red, Italian director Dario Argento’s (Suspiria) slasher masterpiece. A pianist living in Rome (David Hemmings) comes upon the murder of a woman in her apartment and teams up with a female reporter to find the person responsible. Argento’s whodunit is filled to the brim with gorgeous photography, ghastly sights, and delirious twists. But best of all is the final sequence, in which the pianist retraces his steps to discover that the killer had been hiding in plain sight all along. Rewind to the beginning and you’ll discover that you caught an unknowing glimpse, too.


Sleepaway Camp is notorious among horror fans for a number of reasons: the bizarre, stilted acting and dialogue; hilariously amateurish special effects; and ‘80s-to-their-core fashions. But it’s best known for the mind-bending ending, which—full disclosure—reads as possibly transphobic today, though it’s really hard to say what writer-director Robert Hiltzik had in mind. Years after a boating accident that leaves one of two siblings dead, Angela is raised by her aunt and sent to a summer camp with her cousin, where a killer wreaks havoc. In the lurid climax, we see that moody Angela is not only the murderer—she’s actually a boy. Her aunt, who always wanted a daughter, raised her as if she were her late brother. The final animalistic shot prompts as many gasps as cackles.


The Usual Suspects has left everyone who watches it breathless by the time they get to the fakeout conclusion. Roger "Verbal" Kint (Kevin Spacey), a criminal with cerebral palsy, regales an interrogator in the stories of his exploits with a band of fellow crooks, seen in flashback. Hovering over this is the mysterious villainous figure Keyser Söze. It’s not until Verbal leaves and jumps into a car that customs agent David Kujan realizes that the man fabricated details, tricking the law and the viewer into his fake reality, and is in fact the fabled Söze.

6. PRIMAL FEAR (1996)

No courtroom movie can surpass Primal Fear’s discombobulating effect. Richard Gere’s defense attorney becomes strongly convinced that his altar boy client Aaron (Edward Norton) didn’t commit the murder of an archbishop with which he’s charged. The meek, stuttering Aaron has sudden violent outbursts in which he becomes "Roy" and is diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder, leading to a not guilty ruling. Gere’s lawyer visits Aaron about the news, and as he’s leaving, a wonderfully maniacal Norton reveals that he faked the multiple personalities.

7. FIGHT CLUB (1999)

Edward Norton is no stranger to taking on extremely disparate personalities in his roles, from Primal Fear to American History X. The unassuming actor can quickly turn vicious, which led to ideal casting for Fight Club, director David Fincher’s adaptation of the Chuck Palahniuk novel. Fincher cleverly keeps the audience in the dark about the connections between Norton’s timid, unnamed narrator and Brad Pitt’s hunky, aggressive Tyler Durden. After the two start the titular bruising group, the plot significantly increases the stakes, with the club turning into a sort of anarchist terrorist organization. The narrator eventually comes to grips with the fact that he is Tyler and has caused all the destruction around him.


Early in his career, M. Night Shyamalan was frequently (perhaps a little too frequently) compared to Hitchcock for his ability to ratchet up tension while misdirecting his audience. He hasn’t always earned stellar reviews since, but The Sixth Sense remains deservedly legendary for its final twist. At the end of the ghost story, in which little Haley Joel Osment can see dead people, it turns out that the psychologist (Bruce Willis) who’s been working with the boy is no longer living himself, the result of a gunshot wound witnessed in the opening sequence.

9. THE OTHERS (2001)

The Sixth Sense’s climax was spooky, but not nearly as unnerving as Nicole Kidman’s similarly themed ghost movie The Others, released just a couple years later. Kidman gives a superb performance in the elegantly styled film from the Spanish writer-director Alejandro Amenábar, playing a mother in a country house after World War II protecting her photosensitive children from light and, eventually, dead spirits occupying the place. Only by the end does it become clear that she’s in denial about the fact that she’s a ghost, having killed her children in a psychotic break before committing suicide. It’s a bleak capper to a genuinely haunting yarn.


David Lynch’s surrealist movies may follow dream logic, but that doesn’t mean their plots can’t be readily discerned. Mulholland Drive is his most striking work precisely because, in spite of its more wacko moments, it adds up to a coherent, tragic story. The mystery starts innocently enough with the dark-haired Rita (Laura Elena Harring) waking up with amnesia from a car accident in Los Angeles and piecing together her identity alongside the plucky aspiring actress Betty (Naomi Watts). It takes a blue box to unlock the secret that Betty is in fact Diane, who is in love with and envious of Camilla (also played by Harring) and has concocted a fantasy version of their lives. The real Diane arranges for Camilla to be killed, leading to her intense guilt and suicide. Only Lynch can go from Nancy Drew to nihilism so swiftly and deftly.


More from mental floss studios