CLOSE
Gomez, et al., Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF
Gomez, et al., Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF

Astronomers Capture Highest-Resolution Space Image Yet

Gomez, et al., Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF
Gomez, et al., Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF

Behold a far spot in the universe. The picture above—of radio emissions coming from a jet of particles, accelerated to nearly the speed of light by the gravitational power of a black hole more than 900 million light-years away—represents the highest-resolution astronomical image ever captured, its creators say. The astronomers just published their data in the Astrophysical Journal.

Admittedly, it may not look like much to the naked eye, but for what it is, it’s pretty cool. The BL Lacertae (BL Lac) galaxy is far away, and these radio emissions are weak. The picture is compiled from signals collected in November 2013 by the Spektr-R satellite of the RadioAstron mission and 15 radio telescopes on Earth, nine of them part of the National Science Foundation's Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA).

The technique of very long baseline interferometry, or VLBI, has been around since the 1970s. VLBI combines the findings of multiple telescopes to create a composite picture, a process that can yield images 1000 times sharper than those from the Hubble Telescope, according to the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, where the data from all the telescopes was combined to create the image.

In this case, the result was an image with the resolving power of a telescope nearly 63,000 miles wide, or almost eight times the diameter of the Earth. It may look smudgy, but it's the equivalent of a clear picture of a half-dollar coin on the Moon snapped from the Earth, the researchers say in a press statement.

The image gives "unprecedented detail" about BL Lacertae's galactic nucleus, which is powered by a supermassive black hole 200 million times more massive than our Sun.

“In BL Lac, we essentially look into the hottest cosmic hearth which is energizing matter so strongly that it would require achieving temperatures much higher than one trillion degrees, should we have tried to replicate these conditions on Earth,” Andrei Lobanov from the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, a co-investigator on the project, says.

nextArticle.image_alt|e
iStock
arrow
language
How Often Is 'Once in a Blue Moon'? Let Neil deGrasse Tyson Explain
iStock
iStock

From “lit” to “I can’t even,” lots of colloquialisms make no sense. But not all confusing phrases stem from Millennial mouths. Take, for example, “once in a blue moon”—an expression you’ve likely heard uttered by teachers, parents, newscasters, and even scientists. This term is often used to describe a rare phenomenon—but why?

Even StarTalk Radio host Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn’t know for sure. “I have no idea why a blue moon is called a blue moon,” he tells Mashable. “There is nothing blue about it at all.”

A blue moon is the second full moon to appear in a single calendar month. Astronomy dictates that two full moons can technically occur in one month, so long as the first moon rises early in the month and the second appears around the 30th or 31st. This type of phenomenon occurs every couple years or so. So taken literally, “Once in a blue moon” must mean "every few years"—even if the term itself is often used to describe something that’s even more rare.

[h/t Mashable]

arrow
Space
Neutron Star Collision Sheds Light on the Strange Matter That Weighs a Billion Tons Per Teaspoon
Two neutron stars collide.
Two neutron stars collide.

Neutron stars are among the many mysteries of the universe scientists are working to unravel. The celestial bodies are incredibly dense, and their dramatic deaths are one of the main sources of the universe’s gold. But beyond that, not much is known about neutron stars, not even their size or what they’re made of. A new stellar collision reported earlier this year may shed light on the physics of these unusual objects.

As Science News reports, the collision of two neutron stars—the remaining cores of massive stars that have collapsed—were observed via light from gravitational waves. When the two small stars crossed paths, they merged to create one large object. The new star collapsed shortly after it formed, but exactly how long it took to perish reveals keys details of its size and makeup.

One thing scientists know about neutron stars is that they’re really, really dense. When stars become too big to support their own mass, they collapse, compressing their electrons and protons together into neutrons. The resulting neutron star fits all that matter into a tight space—scientists estimate that one teaspoon of the stuff inside a neutron star would weigh a billion tons.

This type of matter is impossible to recreate and study on Earth, but scientists have come up with a few theories as to its specific properties. One is that neutron stars are soft and yielding like stellar Play-Doh. Another school of thought posits that the stars are rigid and equipped to stand up to extreme pressure.

According to simulations, a soft neutron star would take less time to collapse than a hard star because they’re smaller. During the recently recorded event, astronomers observed a brief flash of light between the neutron stars’ collision and collapse. This indicates that a new spinning star, held together by the speed of its rotation, existed for a few milliseconds rather than collapsing immediately and vanishing into a black hole. This supports the hard neutron star theory.

Armed with a clearer idea of the star’s composition, scientists can now put constraints on their size range. One group of researchers pegged the smallest possible size for a neutron star with 60 percent more mass than our sun at 13.3 miles across. At the other end of the spectrum, scientists are determining that the biggest neutron stars become smaller rather than larger. In the collision, a larger star would have survived hours or potentially days, supported by its own heft, before collapsing. Its short existence suggests it wasn’t so huge.

Astronomers now know more about neutron stars than ever before, but their mysterious nature is still far from being fully understood. The matter at their core, whether free-floating quarks or subatomic particles made from heavier quarks, could change all of the equations that have been written up to this point. Astronomers will continue to search the skies for clues that demystify the strange objects.

[h/t Science News]

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios