CLOSE
Original image
iStock

How to Win at Rock-Paper-Scissors

Original image
iStock

Considered in a vacuum of perfect randomness, rock, paper and scissors are all equally viable and equally strong options when playing a good old fashioned game of Rock-Paper-Scissors. Therefore, if you were playing against a computer that approached each game with a fresh batch of absolutely no human emotions or expectations, your best bet would be to play each option exactly one-third of the time. But since you're probably not playing against a computer (right?) you have to take into account your opponent's conditional response—or, how previous events will shape his or her behavior.

To examine this, researchers at Zhejiang University in China had 360 students, broken into 60 groups of six, play 300 rounds of Rock-Paper-Scissors (over the course of a presumably very monotonous couple of hours). Their findings are represented by a series of increasingly complex graphs and equations here, but if you're concerned about the practical application of winning trivial hand games, check out this video produced by the nonprofit Mathematical Sciences Research Institute.

The video details two key findings from the study that help you decide what to play next after an initial game of Rock-Paper-Scissors. In each game, there are two possible outcomes: you win, or you lose. Since we are trying to predict what the other person will do, it helps to consider this from their perspective: they win, or they lose. If they win, they are statistically more like to re-play whatever they just won with than the other two options, and you should react accordingly. So, if you play paper and they beat you with scissors, chances are, they will play scissors again—so in order to win you should play rock.

Let's consider the other option—that they lose. In this case, they are more likely to behave in the next game as you did in the previous scenario, which is to say, play the thing that beats the thing they lost to. Knowing this, you should play the thing that beats the thing that beats the thing they lost to (you follow?). Or, if you play rock and beat their scissors, they will most likely play paper, assuming you will repeat rock, so in turn, you should play scissors. Since there are only three options, you can simplify this by just playing what they played the previous round.

Just hope your opponent didn't also get a look at this study.

Original image
Mattel
arrow
This Just In
Mattel Unveils New Uno Edition for Colorblind Players
Original image
Mattel

On the heels of International Colorblind Awareness Day, Mattel, which owns Uno, announced it would be unveiling a colorblind-friendly edition of the 46-year-old card game.

The updated deck is a collaboration with ColorADD, a global organization for colorblind accessibility and education. In place of its original color-dependent design, this new Uno will feature a small symbol next to each card's number that corresponds with its intended primary color.

As The Verge points out, Mattel is not actually the first to invent a card game for those with colorblindness. But this inclusive move is still pivotal: According to Fast Co. Design, Uno is currently the most popular noncollectible card game in the world. And with access being extended to the 350 million people globally and 13 million Americans who are colorblind, the game's popularity is sure to grow.

Mattel unveils color-friendly Uno deck
Mattel

[h/t: The Verge

Original image
iStock
arrow
fun
Lightning-Fast Teen Sets New Rubik’s Cube World Record
Original image
iStock

In less time than it takes some people to open a pickle jar, 15-year-old Patrick Ponce can solve a Rubik’s Cube. His total time of 4.69 seconds makes him the new holder of the world record for fastest 3-by-3 Rubik’s Cube completion, as highlighted by Compete (and seen in the video below).

Ponce achieved the impressive feat of dexterity at a tournament in Middletown, Virginia, on September 2. He takes the title from the previous Rubik’s Cube speed record holder, Feliks Zemdegs, who solved the puzzle in 4.73 seconds at a competition in Australia in December 2016.

But the teenager may not hold his new position at the top for very long: Expert Rubik's Cubers have been steadily lowering the speed record beneath the 5-second mark since 2015. And human competitors still have a long way to go before solving a cube in 0.887 seconds—that’s the record that was set by a robot in March of 2017.

[h/t Compete]

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios