A Breakthrough Global Study of Depression Finds 44 Genetic Variants Linked to the Disease

iStock
iStock

Though depression affects an estimated 14 percent of the world’s population, scientists know very little about the underlying causes of the disorder, and that makes it incredibly difficult to treat. Even now, researchers are still debating whether common antidepressant medications even work at all, and if they do, why.

New research published in the journal Nature Genetics provides a big step in figuring out why some people suffer from depression while others don’t, identifying 44 genetic variants that are risk factors for major depression, 30 of which are new. They also found two regions of the brain that appear to be associated with the development of the disorder.

The study is the result of an international effort by more than 200 researchers involved with the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. It looked at more than 135,000 cases of depression (both self-reported and clinically assessed) and almost 345,000 control cases. It’s the largest study on the genetic basis of depression ever done.

The researchers found that all humans carry some of the 44 risk factors identified. Some people carry more than others, putting them at greater risk for developing depression. They also identified the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices (both located at the front of the brain) as the regions of the brain probably linked with the development of depression.

Some of the risk factors the researchers identified are also involved in other psychiatric disorders, like schizophrenia, which isn't entirely surprising—a 2007 study from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium found that people with depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia as well as developmental disorders like ADHD and autism share the same variations in four locations in their genetic code.

By identifying genetic risk factors associated with major depressive disorder, the scientists hope to increase our understanding of why depression strikes some people and not others. "[M]ajor depression is a brain disorder," the researchers conclude. "Although this is not unexpected, some past models of [major depressive disorder] have had little or no place for heredity or biology." They firmly put to rest the idea that depression is entirely a matter of environment.

Environment certainly plays a role—the researchers found links between lower education levels and higher body mass index and depression risk as well—but genetics may impact whether someone whose circumstances put them at risk of depression actually develops the disorder. Depression is still highly stigmatized, which often prevents people from seeking treatment for it, according to several studies. Further understanding of the genetic underpinnings of the disorder may help counter negative perceptions of depression as a character flaw or a sign of laziness.

The study could eventually change how doctors treat depression. Many of the genetic variants identified by this study are linked to targets of current antidepressant medications, like serotonin. But the research may also lead to the development of new medications and therapies that could work for more people (current medications don't work for everyone) and potentially have fewer side effects than existing treatments.

The study partially relied on self-reported depression diagnoses, meaning there's some wiggle room in knowing whether those people are actually clinically depressed to the degree that a medical professional would diagnose. Further research will need to confirm that these genetic variants are indeed linked to depression. There are likely even more gene variants related to depression risk, as well, but they might have too small of an effect to be identified by this study. The researchers hope to continue their work to understand the links between environmental stressors, genetic variations, and depression risk in the future.

No Venom, No Problem: This Spider Uses a Slingshot to Catch Prey

Courtesy of Sarah Han
Courtesy of Sarah Han

There are thousands of ways nature can kill, and spider species often come up with the most creative methods of execution. Hyptiotes cavatus, otherwise known as the triangle weaver spider, is one such example. Lacking venom, the spider manages to weaponize its silk, using it to hurl itself forward like a terrifying slingshot to trap its prey.

This unusual method was studied up close for a recent paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by researchers at the University of Akron in Ohio. They say it's the only known instance of an animal using an external device—its web—for power amplification.

Hyptiotes cavatus's technique is simple. After constructing a web, the spider takes one of the main strands and breaks it in half, pulling it taut by moving backwards. Then, it anchors itself to a spot with more webbing in the rear. When the spider releases that webbing, it surges forward, propelled by the sudden release of stored energy. In the slingshot analogy, the webbing is the strap and the spider is the projectile.

This jerking motion causes the web to oscillate, tangling the spider's prey further in silk. The spider can repeat this until the web has completely immobilized its prey, a low-risk entrapment that doesn’t require the spider to get too close and risk injury from larger victims.

The triangle weaver spider doesn’t have venom, and it needs to be proactive in attacking and stifling prey. Once a potential meal lands in its web, it’s able to clear distances much more quickly using this slingshot technique than if it crawled over. In the lab, scientists clocked the spider’s acceleration at 2535 feet per second squared.

Spiders are notoriously nimble and devious. Cebrennus rechenbergi, or the flic-flac spider, can do cartwheels to spin out of danger; Myrmarachne resemble ants and even wiggle their front legs like ant antennae. It helps them avoid predators, but if they see a meal, they’ll drop the act and pounce. With H. cavatus, it now appears they’re learning to use tools, too.

[h/t Live Science]

Bad News: The Best Time of the Day to Drink Coffee Isn’t as Soon as You Wake Up

iStock.com/ThomasVogel
iStock.com/ThomasVogel

If you depend on coffee to help get you through the day, you can rest assured that you’re not the world's only caffeine fiend. Far from it. According to a 2018 survey, 64 percent of Americans said they had consumed coffee the previous day—the highest percentage seen since 2012.

While we’re collectively grinding more beans, brewing more pots, and patronizing our local coffee shops with increased frequency, we might not be maximizing the health and energy-boosting benefits of our daily cup of joe. According to Inc., an analysis of 127 scientific studies highlighted the many benefits of drinking coffee, from a longer average life span to a reduced risk for cancer, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and Parkinson’s disease.

Sounds great, right? The only problem is that the benefits of coffee might be diminished depending on the time of day that you drink it. Essentially, science tells us that it’s best to drink coffee when your body’s cortisol levels are low. That’s because both caffeine and cortisol cause a stress response in your body, and too much stress is bad for your health for obvious reasons. In addition, it might end up making you more tired in the long run.

Cortisol, a stress hormone, is released in accordance with your circadian rhythms. This varies from person to person, but in general, someone who wakes up at 6:30 a.m. would see their cortisol levels peak in different windows, including 8 to 9 a.m., noon to 1 p.m., and 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. Someone who rises at 10 a.m. would experience cortisol spikes roughly three hours later, and ultra-early risers can expect to push this schedule three hours forward.

However, these cortisol levels start to rise as soon as you start moving in the morning, so it isn’t an ideal time to drink coffee. Neither is the afternoon, because doing so could make it more difficult to fall asleep at night. This means that people who wake up at 6:30 a.m. should drink coffee after that first cortisol window closes—roughly between 9:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m.—if they want to benefit for a little caffeine jolt.

To put it simply: "I would say that mid-morning or early afternoon is probably the best time," certified dietitian-nutritionist Lisa Lisiewski told CNBC. "That's when your cortisol levels are at their lowest and you actually benefit from the stimulant itself."

[h/t Inc.]

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER