Interactive Maps Show How Climate Change Will Impact Your Neighborhood

In the next century, researchers predict that climate change will have far-reaching effects on everything from sea levels to wine production. And while the majority of Americans believe climate change will be bad for the country, fewer believe it will have a negative impact on their own lives. A new interactive tool called Climate Explorer from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breaks down the issue to the personal level.

As Futurism reports, Climate Explorer charts nearly a century of projected climate trends through a series of maps and graphs. Residents of Southern California, for example, can type in their city, county, or zip code to see what temperature highs will look like in their neighborhood 73 years down the road. Between 1981 and 2000, Los Angeles saw a yearly average of six days that exceeded 95°F. Low estimates for 2090 put that number between 40 and 70 days of extreme heat.

Southern states aren’t the only places that face extreme changes in the coming decades. Cities accustomed to cooler climates like Boston and Chicago will also see their heat waves grow exponentially. See the outlook for Suffolk County, which Boston is in:

NOAA’s tool also charts data for precipitation trends and heating and cooling degree days, a metric used to look at energy consumption. After checking out the forecast for your neck of the woods, scroll down to the bottom of the page to explore local weather station data from the past 30 years.

[h/t Futurism]

nextArticle.image_alt|e
iStock
arrow
environment
Scientists Have Launched an Earthquake Emoji Design Competition
iStock
iStock

There’s no denying that emojis have changed the way we communicate. As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words—and sometimes a thumbs up or crying face emoji will suffice. But could an earthquake emoji help save lives?

A group of scientists thinks it certainly couldn’t hurt. As The Seattle Times reports, a self-proclaimed #emojiquake steering committee is hosting an open competition for emoji earthquake designs that could be used to swiftly spread news of an imminent earthquake to diverse populations.

“We need an emoji so we can communicate quickly with much larger groups of people,” Dr. Sara McBride, a disaster researcher who works with the U.S. Geological Survey, told The Seattle Times. “People can process pictures faster than words, and not everybody is fluent in English.”

As McBride pointed out on Twitter, there are existing emojis to represent other weather events—like tornados and cyclones—but none to depict an earthquake.

Social media has proven instrumental in alerting large populations about impending natural disasters, giving them time to seek shelter or take proper precautions. According to the BBC, Japan and Mexico both rely on earthquake alerts sent to their digital devices via early warning technology.

The winning design will be chosen by popular vote on Twitter, and the steering committee will work with Unicode Consortium—essentially the world’s emoji gatekeepers—to get the earthquake emoji approved for widespread use on phones, computers, and social media.

You don’t have to be a scientist or graphic designer to enter the contest. The committee has already received more than 40 submissions, but entries will be accepted until July 14. Designs can be emailed to emojiquake@gmail.com, but be sure to check out the guidelines and size specifications on the #emojiquake website.

[h/t The Seattle Times]

nextArticle.image_alt|e
Universal Studios and Amblin Entertainment, Inc. and Legendary Pictures Productions, LLC.
arrow
Pop Culture
What Would It Cost to Operate a Real Jurassic Park?
Universal Studios and Amblin Entertainment, Inc. and Legendary Pictures Productions, LLC.
Universal Studios and Amblin Entertainment, Inc. and Legendary Pictures Productions, LLC.

As the Jurassic Park franchise has demonstrated, trapping prehistoric monsters on an island with bite-sized tourists may not be the smartest idea (record-breaking box office numbers aside). On top of the safety concerns, the cost of running a Jurassic Park would raise its own set of pretty pricey issues. Energy supplier E.ON recently collaborated with physicists from Imperial College London to calculate how much energy the fictional attraction would eat up in the real world.

The infographic below borrows elements that appear in both the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World films. One of the most costly features in the park would be the aquarium for holding the massive marine reptiles. To keep the water heated and hospitable year-round, the park would need to pay an energy bill of close to $3 million a year.

Maintaining a pterosaur aviary would be an even more expensive endeavor. To come up with this cost, the researchers looked at the yearly amount of energy consumed by the Eden Project, a massive biome complex in the UK. Using that data, they concluded that a structure built to hold winged creatures bigger than any bird alive today would add up to $6.6 million a year in energy costs.

Other facilities they envisioned for the island include an egg incubator, embryo fridge, hotel, and emergency bunker. And of course, there would be electric fences running 24/7 to keep the genetic attractions separated from park guests. In total, the physicists estimated that the park would use 455 million kilowatt hours a year, or the equivalent of 30,000 average homes. That annual energy bill comes out to roughly $63 million.

Keep in mind that energy would still only make up one part of Jurassic Park's hypothetical budget—factoring in money for lawsuits would be a whole different story.

Map of dinosaur park.
E.ON

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios