CLOSE
Original image

One More Odd Thing I Just Learned About Fish: Rotting Salmon Impact Forest Ecology

Original image

When I’m not blogging for mental_floss, I can usually be found wearing bright orange rubber pants and gutting, cutting and selling fish at my local Whole Foods (and winning awards for it). Sometimes, my two worlds collide and I find some scientific research involving my ocean-dwelling friends that begs for a blog post. This is one of those times.


Poached with a little lemon and butter, grilled with a bourbon glaze, or left rotting on the ground for weeks—there’s no wrong way to serve salmon.


I don’t recommend that you try that last one, but for Canada’s temperate rainforests, it’s the best recipe there is. Biologist John Reynolds from Simon Fraser University just published the results of a study suggesting that salmon carcasses provide an important “nutrient subsidy” that influences plant growth and diversity in forests.

In the Great Bear Rainforest on British Columbia's central coast, thousands of salmon migrate up different streams and rivers to spawn each year. Bears, wolves, and other predators can sometimes move more than 50 percent of those fish from water to land when they catch dinner, eat what they want, and leave the rest where it falls. The carcasses then rot, passing their nutrients into the ground.

Reynolds and post-doctoral student Morgan Hocking spent four years trudging through old-growth forests looking for dead fish. Whenever they found a carcass, they analyzed any water and cataloged any plants that were nearby. They found that nitrogen released by the fish carcasses favors some plants, like the wonderfully named salmonberry and stink currant, but pushes out others that prefer nutrient-poor soil, like blueberries and false azaleas.

The change in plant density and diversity in the plant community, in turn, affects the animals and insects that use plants for food and shelter. This is, first and foremost, important information for conservationists to have. It’s also a humbling reminder that a sea change can start with something that might seem insignificant. It all starts with a dead fish.

Reference: Hocking, M. and Reynolds, D. (2011). "Impacts of Salmon on Riparian Plant Diversity." Science Vol. 331 no. 6024 pp. 1609-1612. DOI: 10.1126/science.1201079

twitterbanner.jpg

Original image
Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images
arrow
Space
Can’t See the Eclipse in Person? Watch NASA’s 360° Live Stream
Original image
Ian Hitchcock/Getty Images

Depending on where you live, the historic eclipse on August 21 might not look all that impressive from your vantage point. You may be far away from the path of totality, or stuck with heartbreakingly cloudy weather. Maybe you forgot to get your eclipse glasses before they sold out, or can't get away from your desk in the middle of the day.

But fear not. NASA has you covered. The space agency is live streaming a spectacular 4K-resolution 360° live video of the celestial phenomenon on Facebook. The livestream started at 12 p.m. Eastern Time and includes commentary from NASA experts based in South Carolina. It will run until about 4:15 ET.

You can watch it below, on NASA's Facebook page, or on the Facebook video app.

Original image
iStock
arrow
science
What Makes a 'Moon'? (The Answer Is More Complicated Than You'd Think)
Original image
iStock

Not all moons look like the spherical glowing orb that hovers above Earth. In fact, to be a moon, a space rock technically only has to be the natural satellite of a star’s satellite.

That said, these rocks don’t all look, or act, alike. They come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and types, and they all have unique behaviors. For example, Jupiter has 53 known moons—including the solar system’s largest moon, Ganymede—and many of them have elliptical, backwards orbits. Meanwhile, Mars has two moons, and they're irregularly-shaped, dark satellites that orbit the planet’s equator in circles.

Since there are hundreds of moons—and even more conditional ones—in our solar system, this raises a question: Should we deem each and every one of these secondary satellites a “moon”? And if not, should the distinguishing criteria include factors like orbit, size, shape, or visibility from a planet’s surface?

MinuteEarth’s Kate Yoshida explores these questions in the video below.

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios