CLOSE

7 TV Salary Disputes

Television salary disputes are almost as old as the Nielsen charts. Here are some examples.

1. With Friends Like These

By May 2001, the original contracts of the six Friends stars had recently expired, and NBC was slated to announce its new Fall schedule to advertisers just a few days hence. Jennifer, Courteney, the two Matts, et al, had been offered a per-salary episode increase of $600,000, but they decided to unite and hold out for $1,050,000 each. The Central Perk pack had been inspired by the unity of the Seinfeld sidekicks who'd held fast as a group and refused to return to work (and reportedly threatened to "bury the show") lest their $1 million per episode demand was met. The Seinfeld crew eventually settled for $600,000 per, but their compromise proved to be a Pyrrhic victory for many other NBC stars. The network suddenly took a firm stance and refused to be "bullied" by petulant actors. Network brass ordered a series of promo spots to be aired after the season finale; the message of each teaser was "See how it all ends." The network provided copies of the promos to the agents of each actor with a promise that they would begin airing them at noon the next day. The tactic spooked the cast enough to agree to return to the negotiating table and a settlement was quickly reached.

2. Battle of Bunker

A three-episode story arc during Season Five of All in the Family was entitled "Where's Archie?", but what viewers didn't know at the time was how close that question came to not getting answered. Series star Carroll O'Connor had suddenly demanded a salary more in keeping with a "leading man" (no numbers were ever made public) and refused to report to work until he was granted the requested pay boost. In response, the writers came up with an Archie-less story line (he disappeared mysteriously en route to a convention) and the producers began making plans to have Archie die off-screen, and have Archie's pal Stretch Cunningham eventually move in with the Bunker family. A compromise was reached, O'Connor returned to work, and the rest of the cast learned a valuable lesson about just how expendable their characters were.

3. Gettin' Jiggle with It

Despite her ditzy chick persona, Suzanne Somers was no dumb blonde. After struggling in the industry for many years as a single mom, picking up piecemeal work as a model and occasional walk-on acting gigs, she landed the role of Chrissy Snow on ABC's new sitcom Three's Company. At first Chrissy was just "one of the girls"; that is, she was one of the two female co-stars hired as John Ritter's comic foils. But Somers had gone hungry too long to let this opportunity slip through her fingers. She hired Jay Bernstein, Farrah Fawcett's manager, and pledged to give him her entire first six weeks' salary if he could make her as big a star as Farrah. Somers' hair got blonder, her costumes skimpier, and her character goofier. Suddenly she was asked to pose for magazine covers and posters apart from her castmates. As Chrissy-mania escalated, Somers fired Bernstein and her husband, Alan Hamel, stepped in as her personal manager.

One of his first moves on her behalf was to demand a per-episode salary of $150,000 (she'd been receiving $30,000 and had been offered a $5,000 increase) plus 10% ownership of the series. When the producers balked, Somers called in sick for several crucial taping days. Somers and Hamel were sure that the Suits would capitulate, but much to their chagrin they found out that auditions had been launched for a "replacement blonde." Somers' contract was not renewed, and her participation in that season's remaining episodes were reduced to Chrissy (ostensibly out of town, caring for her ailing mother) literally phoning in her few lines.

4. Throw Momma from the Series

Eight years after Rhoda ended, Valerie Harper landed back in prime time with Valerie. Valerie Hogan was a "supermom" raising three rambunctious boys almost single-handedly since her airline pilot husband was away from home much of the time. The sitcom didn't start gaining ratings steam until midway through Season Two. Once viewership increased, Harper decided that her salary should do likewise.

Her new contract specified that she would be paid $100,000 per episode (she had been getting $56,750) and she would also receive 35% of the adjusted gross profits. Harper was fairly confident her demands would be met; after all, she had successfully lobbied for a similar pay boost after the first season of Rhoda. But Lorimar Productions execs prepared a Plan B (wryly referred to in the boardroom as Throw Momma from the Series) in case Harper didn't accept their counter-offer. The suits weren't too concerned about losing their title character, as they believed that teen idol Jason Bateman, not Valerie Harper, was the show's drawing card. Valerie pulled a Suzanne Somers and failed to show up for the first taping of Season Three. Producers filmed the pre-planned Harper-less episode, killed the character in a car crash, and Brandon Tartikoff handed Harper her walking papers.

Beginning with the third season, the show was re-titled Valerie's Family – The Hogans, and finally (after a suitable period of mourning, of course) it became simply The Hogan Family.

5. The Coy and Vance Experiment

The Good Ol' Boys of the Dukes of Hazzard had almost as big of a fan following in their day as David Cassidy had during his Partridge Family prime. And, much like The Partridge Family, the Dukes of Hazzard became a marketing juggernaut with comic books, action figures and posters generating millions of dollars for the show's creators. How popular was the show? Even the General Lee - not an actual human being but a 1969 Dodge Charger - received 30,000 pieces of fan mail per month!

When Season Five began filming, series stars Tom Wopat and John Schneider (who played Luke and Bo Duke) walked off the set in a demand for both a salary increase and a percentage of the approximately $190 million merchandising revenue being generated annually. The producers responded by hiring two look-alike actors in the roles of cousins Coy and Vance Duke, with the onscreen explanation that Bo and Luke had left Hazzard County to join the NASCAR circuit.

As ratings slipped, more car chases and crashes were added to each episode in order to entice viewers, but that strategy only led to a shortage of vintage Chargers available for use on the set. Hazzard fans immediately noticed the use of plastic models and stock footage for scenes involving their beloved General Lee, and they tuned out in droves. By the end of the fifth season, the producers were willing to negotiate with Schneider and Wopat, who returned for the series' final two seasons with a sense of satisfaction and a heftier paycheck.

6. Lose a Turn

Early in his career Chuck Woolery aspired to be a singer, and it was during that era of endeavor that he first met Merv Griffin. He guested on Griffin's talk show in 1973, and Merv was impressed not so much with Woolery's singing as with his affable personality and the way he connected with an audience. A year later when Griffin started pitching a new TV game show based on the pen-and-paper game "hangman," he invited Woolery to audition for the host position. Wheel of Fortune was picked up by NBC in 1975 and quickly became one of television's most popular game shows.

All was hunky-dory for the next seven years, until Chuck had the temerity to ask Merv Griffin for a raise. Woolery felt that his $65,000 salary should be comparable to the big shooters (like Bob Barker and Richard Dawson) over at Goodson-Todman, who were reportedly earning $500,000 per year. Griffin countered with an offer of $400,000 and, in an unusual move, NBC pledged to make up the difference. However, for some reason that offer rubbed Griffin the wrong way, and he threatened to move Wheel to CBS. NBC backed down and Griffin handed Woolery his walking papers. The two men, who had once been good friends, never spoke to one another again for the rest of Merv Griffin's life.

7. Taking Advantage of a Ratings Geyser

When prime time soap Dallas debuted in 1978, it limped along in the ratings and was only renewed for a second season because CBS believed it had potential. The network's instincts were correct; the show caught on and became a top 10 Nielsen ratings hit. The catalyst behind that success was Larry Hagman's portrayal of J.R. Ewing. The oily, conniving J.R. was a new breed of anti-hero – a character viewers loved to hate. The final scene of the final episode of Season Two ended with a "cliffhanger" – J.R. Ewing was shot by an unseen assailant. The audience was left hanging longer than originally anticipated, thanks to an actor's strike that delayed the start of the Fall 1980 season. "Who Shot J.R.?" was on everyone's lips and T-shirts for months, and Larry Hagman decided to make use of the hysteria to demand a significant salary increase.

Hagman was quite candid about the situation in interviews after the fact: "If you've got a chance to make it...then make it! Frankly I don't think anyone is worth that kind of money. I think it's ridiculous except that's the way it is. I would be a fool not to take advantage of it." As it turns out, his bargaining position wasn't quite as set in stone as he believed; behind the scenes, plans were underway for Robert Culp to assume the role of J.R. Ewing if necessary. J.R. would first appear swathed in bandages, you see, and when the gauze was finally removed and Culp's face revealed, it would be explained that J.R. had required extensive plastic surgery as a result of his gunshot wounds. Hagman remained AWOL for the first two episodes of the third season (bandaged body double Ace Moore was used in his stead), but détente was finally achieved and Larry Hagman returned to spread his smarmy evil ooze around Southfork for twelve more seasons.

Previous Installments of TV-Holic...

11 Famous Actors and the Big TV Roles They Turned Down
*
6 Secrets From the Brady Vault
*
6 Unusual TV Deaths
*
Happy 50th Anniversary, Twilight Zone!
*
6 Behind-the-Scenes Secrets From Cheers
*
5 Minor TV Characters Who Hijacked the Show

twitterbanner.jpg

nextArticle.image_alt|e
Aidan Monaghan/AMC
arrow
History
What AMC's The Terror Got Right (And Wrong) About the Franklin Expedition
Aidan Monaghan/AMC
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

WARNING: This post contains spoilers for The Terror. If you haven't finished the show, don't read further!

We know the outcome of Captain Crozier's battle with Tuunbaq in the AMC series The Terror, and that he chose (as some rumors have suggested) to live with the Inuit rather than return to London when he has the chance. Now, it's time for a post-mortem (sorry) of the show's historical highlights. While Dan Simmons, author of the book on which the show is based, created Lady Silence and her supernatural evil spirit—Tuunbaq definitely wasn't stalking the men of the Erebus and Terror back in 1847—much of the show is faithful to the actual events of the Franklin expedition, one of the most enduring mysteries in polar exploration. Here's a rundown of what The Terror got right, and where the show slipped up.

RIGHT: THE TERROR’S ARCTIC ATMOSPHERE

A scene from AMC's The Terror with Sir John Franklin and James Fitzjames
Capt. James Fitzjames (Tobias Menzies), left, and Sir John Franklin (Ciaran Hinds) survey the ice.
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

Right off the bat, The Terror envelops viewers in an icy world that increasingly mirrors the crews’ isolation and desperation. In the first tragic scene, a sailor falls overboard into a sea of accurately rendered pancake ice. In another scene, Captain Francis Crozier sees a sun dog—a solar phenomenon caused by sunlight refracting through clouds of ice crystals, often witnessed by polar explorers. The officers' uniforms and caps are also recreated with authentic details. As the hopelessness of their predicament dawns on the officers and men, summer’s 24-hour daylight vanishes, replaced by the 24-hour darkness of winter. The imprisoned ships tilt with the pressure of the pack ice.

There were a few hiccups noticed by sharp-eyed viewers in the Remembering the Franklin Expedition Facebook group, however. Caulker's mate Cornelius Hickey has a fondness for cigarettes, but most sailors probably smoked pipes at the time, and definitely not inside the ship. (Good thing they had that fire hole bored into the ice!) And assistant surgeon Harry Goodsir’s technique with the Daguerrotype camera in the blind would have produced a terrible photo. His 20th-century stopwatch wouldn’t have helped.

WRONG: FRANKLIN’S BACK-UP PLAN

A scene from AMC's The Terror with Sir John Franklin and Capt. Francis Crozier
Captain Francis Crozier (Jared Harris), right, tries to convince Sir John that they're going to need rescuing pretty soon.
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

In a flashback in Episode 3, Sir John Franklin’s good friend Sir John Ross asks the soon-to-depart commander if the Admiralty had any plans for his rescue. When Franklin says one won’t be needed—since the HMS Erebus and HMS Terror are the best-provisioned ships ever sent to the Arctic—Ross warns him that he’s being naïve. In real life, this conversation was much different, and it didn’t take place at the Admiralty.

Franklin and Ross knew firsthand how a well-provisioned expedition can become a fight for survival. (In Episode 6, Captain James Fitzjames hears the story of Ross’s disastrous Victory expedition from the Erebus's ice master Thomas Blanky, who was really there in 1829-1833.) Ross instead offered to rescue Franklin himself, and captained (at age 72!) a privately funded schooner in search of his lost friend in 1850. And because Ross and the Admiralty had had a major falling out decades before, Ross wouldn’t have been chatting with Franklin at the Admiralty's HQ in Episode 3, and he definitely wouldn’t have been there to hear Lady Jane Franklin’s plea for a search party in Episode 4.

Sir John Ross was the uncle of Sir James Clark Ross, whom we see in the first scene of Episode 1 and its replay, from a different point of view, at the end of Episode 10. In real life, Sir James was one of Crozier's closest friends.

WRONG (MAYBE): KILLER CANS

In a foreboding sign of things to come, Franklin removes a tiny blob of lead from his mouth while eating dinner with Fitzjames in the first episode. By Episode 4, the ships’ cooks are complaining that much of the canned meat is spoiled, and able seaman John Morfin shows up in Goodsir’s infirmary with a blackish line along his gums, an ominous sign of lead poisoning. To test that hypothesis, Goodsir feeds the monkey Jacko some of the canned meat, and then reveals his theory to the surgeon Stephen Stanley: The meat is contaminated with lead and the men have been eating it for more than two years.

The storyline is built upon a famous theory that is now in doubt. In the mid-1980s, forensic anthropologists found high levels of lead in Franklin crewmembers' remains. They suggested the source was poorly sealed food cans, and that lead poisoning led to the men’s deaths. But recent research has pointed to the Erebus’s and Terror’s unique water systems [PDF], which used lead pipes, as the primary source of contamination. And, a 2015 study compared lead content among seven crewmembers’ remains and found wide variation, suggesting some men may not have been debilitated.

RIGHT: SERIOUS SCURVY

A scene from AMC's The Terror with Goodsir and Young
Dr. Goodsir (Paul Ready) tries to save David Young (Alfie Kingsnorth).
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

David Young, the first fatality of The Terror, doesn’t show any signs of scurvy in Goodsir’s autopsy. But by the summer of 1848, the remaining crew camped on King William Island hasn’t eaten fresh meat in three years, and the Navy-issued lemon juice rations have either run out or lost potency. Signs of severe Vitamin C deficiency appear: Fitzjames’s old bullet wounds, which he boasted about at the officers' table in the first episode, begin to open up, and a rough-looking Lieutenant George Henry Hodgson loses a tooth as he chews the leather from his boot (a nod to Franklin’s awful 1819-1822 Arctic expedition) in Episode 9. The scenes match what most, though not all, historians and researchers now believe: that a grim combination of scurvy, starvation, exposure, and underlying illnesses spelled the end for Franklin’s men.

(VERY LIKELY) WRONG: FRANKLIN’S CAUSE OF DEATH

A scene from AMC's The Terror with Sir John Franklin and Tunnbaq
Tuunbaq takes a deadly swipe at Sir John.
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

The terrifying scene in Episode 3 in which Tuunbaq mauls Franklin to death and shoves him down the fire hole is most likely not the way it actually happened. Historically speaking, just after the men abandon ship in April 1848, Crozier and Fitzjames updated the note left in the cairn the previous spring. They reported that “Sir John Franklin died on 11th June 1847”—just 19 days after Lieutenant Graham Gore and mate Charles Des Voeux had left the same paper behind on May 24, 1847 and reported the crews “all well.” Unfortunately, it’s the only record ever found about the expedition’s progress, and no one knows for sure how Franklin died or what happened to his body. Inuit oral histories collected by Franklin scholar Louie Kamookak suggest Franklin was buried under a flat stone somewhere on King William Island, but to date, no trace has been found.

RIGHT: THAT CRAZY CARNIVAL

The wild masquerade party in the middle of the bleak and frozen Arctic, which Fitzjames orders as a morale-booster for the men in Episode 6, may seem like a total anachronism. In real life, it was a time-honored tradition. (We don't know for sure if the Erebus and Terror had a carnival because no logbooks from the expedition have been found, but it's likely that they did.) In 1819-1820, Sir Edward Parry led the first polar expedition to purposefully overwinter in the Arctic. He worried about how the men would fare psychologically during the months of darkness and teeth-cracking cold, so he brought along trunks of theatrical costumes and launched the Royal Arctic Theatre, a fortnightly diversion for the officers and men to perform silly plays and musicals. It kept the men busy writing shows, practicing their parts, and building sets, which Parry thought was the key to staying sane. The scheme was such a success that subsequent expeditions kept the tradition going. But unlike in The Terror, the frivolities didn’t end in fiery conflagrations and mass casualties. 

(POSSIBLY) WRONG: HICKEY’S MURDEROUS MUTINY

A scene from AMC's The Terror with Cornelius Hickey
Mr. Hickey (Adam Nagaitis) cooks up a mutiny.
Aidan Monaghan/AMC

In Episode 7, Hickey plans a mutiny and convinces enough of the desperate men to follow him, splitting the remaining officers and men into two groups and, in Episode 9, taking Crozier captive. Hickey also kidnaps Goodsir because, as the expedition’s sole remaining surgeon, he is the only one who knows how to wield a bone saw. We don’t know, though, if there was an actual mutiny among the Franklin survivors. The remains of some of Franklin's men were found in different locations, but that doesn’t necessarily indicate a breakdown of order. Smaller groups may have split off from the main group because they simply couldn’t march any farther or had decided to return to the ships. Despite the harsh conditions of service in the Royal Navy, mutinies were quite rare.

RIGHT: CANNIBALISM

Hickey’s followers, starving and desperate, dine on morsels of steward William Gibson in one of Episode 9’s most wrenching scenes with historical precedent. Hudson’s Bay Company trader John Rae discovered the truth about the Franklin expedition from interviews with Inuit in 1854, including testimony that the men resorted to cannibalism to survive. In his infamous letter to the Admiralty, he wrote, “from the mutilated state of many of the bodies, and the contents of the kettles, it is evident that our wretched countrymen had been driven to the last dread alternative as a means of sustaining life.” Victorian England refused to believe it—but Inuit testimony and forensic research [PDF] supported Rae’s account, finally revealing the expedition’s fate.

nextArticle.image_alt|e
Robert Viglasky, Netflix
arrow
entertainment
11 Things We Know About The Crown Season 3
Robert Viglasky, Netflix
Robert Viglasky, Netflix

Now that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's wedding is in the books, it's time to start thinking about the next big royal event: season three of The Crown. Since making its premiere on November 4, 2016, the Netflix series—which won the 2017 Golden Globe for Best Drama—has become an indisputable hit. The streaming series, created by two-time Oscar nominee Peter Morgan, follows the reign of Queen Elizabeth II and the ups and downs of the royal family.

Now that you’ve surely binge-watched both of the first two seasons, we’re looking ahead to season three. Here’s everything we know about The Crown’s third season so far.

1. OLIVIA COLMAN WILL PLAY THE QUEEN.

 Olivia Colman attends the 'Murder On The Orient Express' world premiere at Royal Albert Hall on November 2, 2017 in London, England
John Phillips, Getty Images

From the very beginning, creator Peter Morgan made it clear that each season of The Crown would cover roughly a decade of history, and that the cast would change for season three and again in season five (to more accurately represent the characters 20 and 40 years later). In October, it was announced that Olivia Colman would take over the role of Queen Elizabeth II.

When discussing her replacement with Jimmy Fallon, Claire Foy praised her successor, joking that "You'll forget all about me and the rest of the cast. You'll be like, ‘Who are they?' We're the warm-up act."

Though she might be best known to American audiences for her roles in Broadchurch and The Night Manager (the latter of which earned her a Golden Globe in 2017), Colman is no stranger to playing a member of the royal family. In 2012, she played Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon—wife of King George VI and the mother of Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret—in Hyde Park on Hudson. Later this year, she’ll play Queen Anne in Yorgos Lanthimos’s The Favourite, with Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz.

2. WE MAY NOT SEE A THIRD SEASON UNTIL 2019.

While no official release date for season three has been given, the BBC reported that we wouldn't see Colman as Queen Elizabeth II until 2019—which means we've got some more waiting to do. The good news, however, is that Morgan confirmed they're shooting seasons three and four "back-to-back. I’m writing them all at the moment," he said in February. Meaning we may not have to wait as long for season four to arrive.

3. TOBIAS MENZIES IS TAKING OVER AS PRINCE PHILIP.

 Actor Tobias Menzies attends 'The Terror' premiere at the Philips Gran Via Theater on March 20, 2018 in Madrid, Spain
Carlos Alvarez, Getty Images

Between Outlander and The Terror, Tobias Menzies is keeping pretty busy these days. In late March it was announced that he’d be taking over Matt Smith’s role as Prince Philip for the next two seasons of The Crown—and Smith couldn't be happier.

Shortly after the announcement was made, Smith described his replacement as "the perfect casting," telling the Observer: "He’s a wonderful actor. I worked with him on The History Boys, and he’s a totally fantastic actor. I’m very excited to see what he does with Prince Philip." Of course, passing an iconic role on to another actor is something that former Doctor Who star Smith has some experience with. "It was hard to give up the Doctor—you want to play it for ever. But with this, you know you can’t," Smith told The Times last October.

For his part, Menzies said that, "I'm thrilled to be joining the new cast of The Crown and to be working with Olivia Colman again. I look forward to becoming her 'liege man of life and limb.'"

4. PAUL BETTANY CAME VERY CLOSE TO HAVING MENZIES'S ROLE.

If you remember hearing rumblings that Paul Bettany would be playing the Duke of Edinburgh, no, you're not imagining things. For a while it seemed like the London-born actor was a shoo-in for the part, but it turned out that scheduling was not in Bettany's favor. When asked about the rumors that he was close to signing a deal to play Philip, Bettany said that, "We discussed it. We just couldn’t come to terms on dates really. [That] is all that happened."

5. HELENA BONHAM CARTER WILL PLAY PRINCESS MARGARET.

Honoured @thecrownnetflix

A post shared by Vanessa Kirby (@vanessa__kirby) on

After months of speculation—and one big hint via Instagram (see above)—in early May, Netflix finally confirmed the previously "all but confirmed" rumor that Helena Bonham Carter would play Princess Margaret in The Crown's next season. "I’m not sure which I’m more terrified about—doing justice to the real Princess Margaret or following in the shoes of Vanessa Kirby’s Princess Margaret,” Bonham Carter said of the role. “The only thing I can guarantee is that I’ll be shorter [than Vanessa]."

Like Colman, Bonham Carter also has some experience playing a royal: She played Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, a.k.a. the Queen Mother, in the Oscar-winning The King's Speech.

6. JASON WATKINS WILL PLAY PRIME MINISTER HAROLD WILSON.

At the same time Netflix confirmed Bonham Carter's casting, the network announced that BAFTA-winning actor Jason Watkins had been cast as Harold Wilson, who was prime minister between 1964 and 1970 and again between 1974 and 1976. "I am delighted to become part of this exceptional show,” Watkins said. “And so thrilled to be working once again with Peter Morgan. Harold Wilson is a significant and fascinating character in our history. So looking forward to bringing him to life, through a decade that transformed us culturally and politically."

7. PRINCESS DIANA WILL NOT APPEAR IN SEASON 3.

As The Crown moves forward, time will, too. Though fans worried that, based on the current time jumps between seasons, it would take another few years to see Princess Diana be introduced, Morgan told People Magazine that Princess Diana would make her first appearance toward the end of season three and that she will be heavily featured in the two seasons that follow. However, casting director Nina Gold later dispelled that notion.

"Diana’s not in this season," Gold told Vanity Fair. "When we do get to her, that is going to be pretty interesting." Charles and Diana did not meet until 1977, when the Prince began dating Diana's older sister, Sarah. According to Variety, season three will only cover the years 1964 to 1976.

8. CAMILLA PARKER BOWLES WILL BE FEATURED.

Lady Diana Spencer and Camilla Parker-Bowles at Ludlow Races where Prince Charles is competing, 1980
Express Newspapers/Archive Photos/Getty Images

As it’s difficult to fully cover the relationship between Prince Charles and Princess Diana without including Camilla Parker Bowles as part of the story, the current Duchess of Cornwall will make her first appearance in season three.

“Peter [Morgan]’s already talking about the most wonderful things,” The Crown producer Suzanne Mackie revealed during the BFI & Radio Times Television Festival in April 2017. “You start meeting Camilla Parker Bowles in season three,” she said, noting that they were then in the process of mapping out seasons three and four.

9. BUCKINGHAM PALACE WILL BE GETTING AN UPGRADE.

Though it's hard to imagine a more lavish set design, Left Bank—the series's production company—requested more studio space for its sets at Elstree Studios in late 2017, and received approval to do just that in April. According to Variety, Left Bank specifically "sought planning permission for a new Buckingham Palace main gates and exterior, including the iconic balcony on which the royals stand at key moments. The Downing Street plans show a new Number 10 and the road leading up to the building itself. The sketches for the new work, seen by Variety, show an aerial view of Downing Street with a Rolls Royce pulling up outside Number 10."

10. PRINCESS MARGARET’S MARRIAGE TO LORD SNOWDON WILL STILL BE A PART OF THE STORY.

Vanessa Kirby as Princess Margaret in 'The Crown'
Alex Bailey/Netflix

Princess Margaret’s roller-coaster relationship with Antony Armstrong-Jones played a major part of The Crown’s second season, and the dissolution of their marriage will play out in season three.

“We’re now writing season three," Robert Lacey, the series’s history consultant and the author of The Crown: The Official Companion, Volume 1, told Town & Country in December. “And in season three, without giving anything away—it’s on the record, it’s history—we’ll see the breakup of this extraordinary marriage between Margaret and Snowdon. This season, you see how it starts, and what a strange character, a brilliant character Snowdon was.”

11. VANESSA KIRBY WOULD LIKE TO SEE PRINCESS MARGARET GET A SPINOFF.

While Kirby, who has played Princess Margaret in the first two seasons, knows that the cast will undergo a shakeup, she’s not afraid to admit that she’s jealous of all the juicy drama Bonham Carter will get to experience as the character.

“I was so desperate to do further on,” Kirby told Vanity Fair, “because it’s going to be so fun [to enact] when their marriage starts to break down. You see the beginnings of that in episode 10. I kept saying to [Peter Morgan], ‘Can’t you put in an episode where Margaret and Tony have a big row, and she throws a plate at his head?’ I’m so envious of the actress who gets to do it.”

Kirby even went so far as to suggest that Margaret’s life could be turned into its own series, telling Morgan, “‘We need to do a spinoff.’ You actually could do 10 hours on Margaret because she’s so fascinating. There’s so much to her, and she’s such an interesting character. I know that parts like this hardly ever come along."

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios