CLOSE
Original image

The Quick 10: 10 "Fifth Beatles"

Original image

09.09.09: It's Beatlemania all over again. At least, it is at my house. And to some degree, here on the _floss "“ we've covered Nine Things You Probably Didn't Know About the Beatles and Nine Women Who Inspired Beatles Songs. And now we bring you 10 people who have some sort of claim to the "Fifth Beatle" nickname. Lots of musicians and friends of the band have been unofficially bestowed the honor over the years "“ here are just a few of them.

stuart1. Stuart Sutcliffe. Poor, tragic Stu. He was the Beatles' original bassist (John Lennon's best friend) back in the very early days when they were going by The Silver Beetles. He wasn't a great bass player "“ his real talent was painting "“ and left the group of his own volition in 1961, and tragically died of an intracranial brain hemorrhage on April 10, 1962, at the very young age of 21. The Beatles paid homage to him by including their first bass player on the cover of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. And if you're interested in Sutcliffe and his early role with the Beatles, check out Backbeat, a movie starring Stephen Dorff as Sutcliffe. Paul didn't care for the movie, for the record.

best2. Pete Best is probably the man who is most often referred to as the Fifth Beatle. He was the pre-Ringo drummer and was chosen in part because of his drumming skills, sure, but also because he had quite the female following, which Paul McCartney felt would help the group. There have been different stories over the years as to why Best was replaced. George Martin has said that he preferred a stronger drummer to give the rest of the band a good base, and various other members of the extended Beatle family have said that Best just didn't mesh well with the rest of the band on a personal level and refused to conform to the band style. Either way, manager Brian Epstein gave Best the boot, much to the chagrin of female fans who adored the brooding Best. They showed up at concerts chanting "Pete Forever, Ringo Never" and heckled the band throughout their sets.

Epstein013. Speaking of Brian Epstein, Paul McCartney once said that if anyone held claim to the Fifth Beatle title, it was Brian, and George Martin concurred. Epstein was the Beatles' manager form 1961 until he died in 1967 and was pretty key in the band's stratospheric rise. He was the glue that held the Beatles together and when he passed away after an accidental drug overdose, John Lennon knew the Fab Four were finished. In a 1970 interview with Rolling Stone, Lennon commented, "I knew that we were in trouble then... I thought, "˜We've [expletive] had it now.'"

aspinall4. And 5. Derek Taylor and Neil Aspinall. These nominations for Fifth Beatle came from George Harrison. Derek Taylor was a journalist who gave the Beatles one of their first rave reviews. As a result, he became entrenched in the scene and eventually started writing press releases for the Liverpudlians. When Apple Corps was formed, he was named press officer. Similarly, Aspinall (pictured) started out as a mere road manager with the band, then rose to personal assistant and finally Apple Corps CEO. You can also hear him on a few recordings "“ he played harmonica on "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite" and sang in the chorus of "Yellow Submarine."

martin6. George Martin, who produced a vast majority of the Beatles' recordings, is another member of the Beatles posse who often gets tagged with the Fifth Beatle moniker. But not only did he produce most of their music, he also arranged strings and horns for most of their songs that called for them and wrote the entire instrumental part of the Yellow Submarine album. He also played keys on a couple of songs, including the Baroque-inspired piece in "In My Life."

JIMMY7. It's the night before the Beatles' Australasian leg of their 1964 tour is supposed to kick off, and Ringo abruptly comes down with acute tonsillitis. What do you do? You call in Jimmy Nicol. Jimmy had drummed on a cover album of Beatles hits and knew all of the songs, so he was a natural fit for the group. He actually wore Ringo's clothes on stage.

clapton8. Eric Clapton contributed his considerable talents on the guitar to "While My Guitar Gently Weeps," but the reason he is occasionally referred to as the Fifth Beatle is because of his close friendships with all of the band members, especially George Harrison. In fact, Clapton and Harrison even shared a wife (not at the same time, of course "“ Clapton married Pattie Boyd after she and Harrison divorced).

billy9. Billy Preston is only one of two artists to ever receive joint-billing with The Beatles "“ the "Get Back" single credits "The Beatles with Billy Preston." John even once suggested that Billy become the Fifth Beatle. Preston played on the Get Back sessions on quite a few occasions, and played during the famous rooftop performance. Post break-up, he appeared on projects by both Ringo and George.

griffiths10. Eric Griffiths dates back to even before Stuart Sutcliffe. In the late "˜50s, the group that would be known as the Silver Beetles and then the Beatles were then known as the Blackjacks before evolving into the Quarrymen. When Paul McCartney was invited to join the Quarrymen, and then George Harrison, Griffiths was booted out. Except no one actually told him "“ they just failed to invite him to practices after that. When he eventually called to see when the next practice was, he was informed that he was no longer needed at said practices.

Who do you think is the most-qualified to be the Fifth Beatle?

If you're like me and need to satiate your Beatles fix until you can play the game, here are a few more _floss posts on the Fab Four:
Happy Anniversary, Abbey Road!
Also, More on Abbey Road
Name that Beatles Album
It Was 42 Years Ago Today
With a Little Help from my Floss

Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva
technology
arrow
Man Buys Two Metric Tons of LEGO Bricks; Sorts Them Via Machine Learning
May 21, 2017
Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva

Jacques Mattheij made a small, but awesome, mistake. He went on eBay one evening and bid on a bunch of bulk LEGO brick auctions, then went to sleep. Upon waking, he discovered that he was the high bidder on many, and was now the proud owner of two tons of LEGO bricks. (This is about 4400 pounds.) He wrote, "[L]esson 1: if you win almost all bids you are bidding too high."

Mattheij had noticed that bulk, unsorted bricks sell for something like €10/kilogram, whereas sets are roughly €40/kg and rare parts go for up to €100/kg. Much of the value of the bricks is in their sorting. If he could reduce the entropy of these bins of unsorted bricks, he could make a tidy profit. While many people do this work by hand, the problem is enormous—just the kind of challenge for a computer. Mattheij writes:

There are 38000+ shapes and there are 100+ possible shades of color (you can roughly tell how old someone is by asking them what lego colors they remember from their youth).

In the following months, Mattheij built a proof-of-concept sorting system using, of course, LEGO. He broke the problem down into a series of sub-problems (including "feeding LEGO reliably from a hopper is surprisingly hard," one of those facts of nature that will stymie even the best system design). After tinkering with the prototype at length, he expanded the system to a surprisingly complex system of conveyer belts (powered by a home treadmill), various pieces of cabinetry, and "copious quantities of crazy glue."

Here's a video showing the current system running at low speed:

The key part of the system was running the bricks past a camera paired with a computer running a neural net-based image classifier. That allows the computer (when sufficiently trained on brick images) to recognize bricks and thus categorize them by color, shape, or other parameters. Remember that as bricks pass by, they can be in any orientation, can be dirty, can even be stuck to other pieces. So having a flexible software system is key to recognizing—in a fraction of a second—what a given brick is, in order to sort it out. When a match is found, a jet of compressed air pops the piece off the conveyer belt and into a waiting bin.

After much experimentation, Mattheij rewrote the software (several times in fact) to accomplish a variety of basic tasks. At its core, the system takes images from a webcam and feeds them to a neural network to do the classification. Of course, the neural net needs to be "trained" by showing it lots of images, and telling it what those images represent. Mattheij's breakthrough was allowing the machine to effectively train itself, with guidance: Running pieces through allows the system to take its own photos, make a guess, and build on that guess. As long as Mattheij corrects the incorrect guesses, he ends up with a decent (and self-reinforcing) corpus of training data. As the machine continues running, it can rack up more training, allowing it to recognize a broad variety of pieces on the fly.

Here's another video, focusing on how the pieces move on conveyer belts (running at slow speed so puny humans can follow). You can also see the air jets in action:

In an email interview, Mattheij told Mental Floss that the system currently sorts LEGO bricks into more than 50 categories. It can also be run in a color-sorting mode to bin the parts across 12 color groups. (Thus at present you'd likely do a two-pass sort on the bricks: once for shape, then a separate pass for color.) He continues to refine the system, with a focus on making its recognition abilities faster. At some point down the line, he plans to make the software portion open source. You're on your own as far as building conveyer belts, bins, and so forth.

Check out Mattheij's writeup in two parts for more information. It starts with an overview of the story, followed up with a deep dive on the software. He's also tweeting about the project (among other things). And if you look around a bit, you'll find bulk LEGO brick auctions online—it's definitely a thing!

Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief
entertainment
arrow
What Happened to Jamie and Aurelia From Love Actually?
May 26, 2017
Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief

Fans of the romantic-comedy Love Actually recently got a bonus reunion in the form of Red Nose Day Actually, a short charity special that gave audiences a peek at where their favorite characters ended up almost 15 years later.

One of the most improbable pairings from the original film was between Jamie (Colin Firth) and Aurelia (Lúcia Moniz), who fell in love despite almost no shared vocabulary. Jamie is English, and Aurelia is Portuguese, and they know just enough of each other’s native tongues for Jamie to propose and Aurelia to accept.

A decade and a half on, they have both improved their knowledge of each other’s languages—if not perfectly, in Jamie’s case. But apparently, their love is much stronger than his grasp on Portuguese grammar, because they’ve got three bilingual kids and another on the way. (And still enjoy having important romantic moments in the car.)

In 2015, Love Actually script editor Emma Freud revealed via Twitter what happened between Karen and Harry (Emma Thompson and Alan Rickman, who passed away last year). Most of the other couples get happy endings in the short—even if Hugh Grant's character hasn't gotten any better at dancing.

[h/t TV Guide]

SECTIONS
BIG QUESTIONS
BIG QUESTIONS
WEATHER WATCH
BE THE CHANGE
JOB SECRETS
QUIZZES
WORLD WAR 1
SMART SHOPPING
STONES, BONES, & WRECKS
#TBT
THE PRESIDENTS
WORDS
RETROBITUARIES