CLOSE
Original image

How Nate Silver Predicted Obama's Win

Original image

Throughout last year's election, Nate Silver ran a fascinating website called FiveThirtyEight, named after the number of electors in the United States electoral college. Silver is a statistician, and he spent every day applying his considerable math chops to the various problems of the election -- namely, who would win, where, and by how much. By aggregating and analyzing publicly available poll data, Silver developed a series of statistical models that predicted, with stunning accuracy, what would happen on election day.

Silver got his start as a baseball statistician before he started FiveThirtyEight. A New York Magazine profile from last fall explains:

...At his day job, Silver works for Baseball Prospectus, a loosely organized think tank that, in the last ten years, has revolutionized the interpretation of baseball stats. Furthermore, Silver himself invented a system called PECOTA, an algorithm for predicting future performance by baseball players and teams. (It stands for "player empirical comparison and optimization test algorithm," but is named, with a wink, after the mediocre Kansas City Royals infielder Bill Pecota.) Baseball Prospectus has a reputation in sports-media circles for being unfailingly rigorous, occasionally arrogant, and almost always correct.

When Silver turned his attention to politics, his baseball stats experience came in handy. Silver's models are predictive, meaning that his intent was to figure out what would happen on a certain date (November 4) based on the trend and accuracy of all the available data. This is a little different from what most political pollsters do -- their typical task is to take a snapshot of the electorate on a given day, then analyze that. From the New York article:

As pollster John Zogby put it to me, "We take snapshots. And when you take many snapshots in a row, you get motion pictures."

Similar to how a sports prediction seeks to predict a larger outcome (like which team will win the pennant), based on achieving a series of sub-goals (teams winning various games and playoffs), Silver saw the presidential and congressional elections as a series of smaller games in each state (primaries) that would select the players (candidates), who would eventually compete in the World Series (the election). He had tons of data coming out each day from existing pollsters. He just needed a methodology to use that data, and pull good predictions from it. The New York profile continues:

So he came up with a system that predicts a pollster's future performance based on how good it's been in the past. In finding his average, Silver weights each poll differently—ranking them according to his own statistic, PIE (pollster-introduced error)—based on a number of factors, including its track record and its methodology. One advantage of this system is that, during the primaries, the system actually got smarter. Because each time a poll performed well in a primary, its ranking improved.

For the general election, this gets trickier, since you have polls coming out every single day and you can't know which ones are getting it right until Election Day. You can, however, weigh these new polls based on the pollster's history, the poll's sample size, and how recently the poll was conducted. You can also track trends over time and use these trend lines to forecast where things will end up on November 4. You can also, as Silver has done, analyze all the presidential polling data back to 1952, looking for information as to what is likely to happen next. (For example, how much the polls are likely to tighten in the last month of the race, which they traditionally do.) You can also run 10,000 computer simulations of the election every day based on your poll projections. (Think of this as sort of like that scene at the end of WarGames, where the computer blurs through every possible nuclear-war scenario.) As of October 8, the day after the town-hall debate, Silver's simulations had Obama winning the election 90 percent of the time.

In the end, Silver got it right. His models predicted the popular vote within 1 percentage point as well as predicting 49 of 50 state races correctly. After the election, Silver has continued to analyze special topics, like the Coleman/Franken recount, and his work there has been entertaining as well as enlightening (see his post on real Minnesota ballots entitled Brett Favre Beats Lizard People).

If you're interested in politics, statistics, or even baseball, I think you'll enjoy the New York profile of Silver, which came out before the election was decided. For a bit of after-the-fact analysis, check out this New York Times article from November 9. In any case, Nate Silver is a kind of nerd hero for me: a man whose statistical superpowers brought him to national prominence. Let's hear it for math!

Original image
iStock
arrow
Animals
Watch a Rogue Pet Dog Interrupt a Russian News Anchor on Air
Original image
iStock

Last week, a Russian news broadcast briefly went to the dogs after its host was startled by a surprise co-anchor: a friendly black canine that wandered on set, announced its presence with a loud bark, and climbed onto her desk.

 

As TODAY reports, Mir24 TV anchor Ilona Linarte went off script for a few minutes, telling viewers "I've got a dog here. What is this dog doing in the studio?" After the initial shock wore off, she gave her furry guest a tepid welcome, patting its head as she gently pushed it off the desk. ("I actually prefer cats,'' Linarte remarked. "I'm a cat lady.")

Linarte’s query was answered when the TV station announced that the dog had accompanied another show’s guest on set, and somehow got loose. That said, rogue animals have a proud tradition of crashing live news broadcasts around the world, so we’re assuming this won’t be the last time a news anchor is upstaged by an adorable guest star (some of which have better hair than them).

[h/t TODAY]

Original image
Falcon Heavy and Dragon. Image credit: SpaceX via Wikimedia Commons // CC0 1.0
SpaceX Is Sending Two Private Citizens Around the Moon
Original image
Falcon Heavy and Dragon. Image credit: SpaceX via Wikimedia Commons // CC0 1.0

Two members of the public are set to take an historic trip around the Moon, according to an announcement from SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. As The Verge reports, the anonymous private citizens have already placed substantial deposits on the commercial space flight.

The private spacecraft company SpaceX revealed on Monday that the Falcon Heavy rocket will be launching with its Crew Dragon spacecraft in late 2018. The mission will consist of a circumnavigation of the Moon, passing over the body’s surface before traveling farther into space and returning to Earth. In total, the trip will cover 300,000 to 400,000 miles and take a week to complete.

A noteworthy part of the plan is the human cargo that will be on board. Instead of professional astronauts, the craft will carry two paying customers into space. The passengers, who’ve yet to be named, will both need to pass several fitness tests before they're permitted to make the journey. According to The Verge, Musk said the customers are “very serious” and that the cost of the trip is “comparable” to that of a crewed mission to the International Space Station. The goal for SpaceX is to eventually send one or two commercial flights into space each year, which could account for 10 to 20 percent of the company’s earnings.

[h/t The Verge]

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios