This is your blog on drugs. Any comments?

Seriously folks, this country has a drug problem, and if you don't believe me, just start calculating what the government has spent on its "war on drugs" since the 80s -- it's in the hundreds of billions of dollars. A not-inconsequential chunk of that has surely gone to funding anti-drug advertising campaigns and public service announcements, and if you're wondering why we haven't won that pseky drug war yet, at least part of the answer lies in those (unfortunately laughable) moldy oldies: the PSAs. YouTube, of course, is a veritable treasure-trove of them.

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles PSA

Wow, if even anthropomorphized mutated turtles won't smoke weed, then I'm sure not touching the stuff! Actually, what I find most amazing about this spot (and many others like it) is its use of a corporate selling tool (the turtles, who sold kids toys, video games, comic books and, inadvertently perhaps, pizza) to sell a moral message. Since when is it OK for hyper-violent mutants to teach our kids right from wrong?

Robocop PSA

Hmm, I'm sure a film set in the 80s was a great place to get away from drugs. (Ever heard the stories about Martin Scorsese?) And once again, a killing machine (who in many respects acts like a person hopped up on PCP) becomes an oracle of moral advice.

I learned it by watching you!

Ahh, revel in the classicness. Parodied everywhere from Robot Chicken to Family Guy, it's probably as well known as it is only because it was so effective in getting its message across -- hey, credit where credit is due -- a classic example of why the War on Drugs was so good at producing quotable quotes. Heck, in the pantheon of 80s catch phrases, it's up there with "Where's the beef?" and "I've fallen and I can't get up!" (Which, if you absolutely must watch it -- as I did -- is here.)

Drug abuse is the new slavery

If the Partnership for a Drug-Free America wanted to get people talking, this controversial 1991 PSA certainly did it (to wit: someone titled this YouTube video "Racist anti-drug PSA.") By recasting the drug war along race lines, they not only muddied the waters, they started to look desperate. It's a far cry from an egg frying in a pan! And speaking of which, so is this 1998 follow-up to the classic "this is your brain on drugs" PSA:

This is (still) your brain on drugs

Is it just me, or is there some complicated meta commentary on what being on drugs is really like going on here? (I mean, she's supposed to be high, right?) Do not let people on drugs into your kitchen! And yes, that's the girl from She's All That.

Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva
Man Buys Two Metric Tons of LEGO Bricks; Sorts Them Via Machine Learning
May 21, 2017
Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva

Jacques Mattheij made a small, but awesome, mistake. He went on eBay one evening and bid on a bunch of bulk LEGO brick auctions, then went to sleep. Upon waking, he discovered that he was the high bidder on many, and was now the proud owner of two tons of LEGO bricks. (This is about 4400 pounds.) He wrote, "[L]esson 1: if you win almost all bids you are bidding too high."

Mattheij had noticed that bulk, unsorted bricks sell for something like €10/kilogram, whereas sets are roughly €40/kg and rare parts go for up to €100/kg. Much of the value of the bricks is in their sorting. If he could reduce the entropy of these bins of unsorted bricks, he could make a tidy profit. While many people do this work by hand, the problem is enormous—just the kind of challenge for a computer. Mattheij writes:

There are 38000+ shapes and there are 100+ possible shades of color (you can roughly tell how old someone is by asking them what lego colors they remember from their youth).

In the following months, Mattheij built a proof-of-concept sorting system using, of course, LEGO. He broke the problem down into a series of sub-problems (including "feeding LEGO reliably from a hopper is surprisingly hard," one of those facts of nature that will stymie even the best system design). After tinkering with the prototype at length, he expanded the system to a surprisingly complex system of conveyer belts (powered by a home treadmill), various pieces of cabinetry, and "copious quantities of crazy glue."

Here's a video showing the current system running at low speed:

The key part of the system was running the bricks past a camera paired with a computer running a neural net-based image classifier. That allows the computer (when sufficiently trained on brick images) to recognize bricks and thus categorize them by color, shape, or other parameters. Remember that as bricks pass by, they can be in any orientation, can be dirty, can even be stuck to other pieces. So having a flexible software system is key to recognizing—in a fraction of a second—what a given brick is, in order to sort it out. When a match is found, a jet of compressed air pops the piece off the conveyer belt and into a waiting bin.

After much experimentation, Mattheij rewrote the software (several times in fact) to accomplish a variety of basic tasks. At its core, the system takes images from a webcam and feeds them to a neural network to do the classification. Of course, the neural net needs to be "trained" by showing it lots of images, and telling it what those images represent. Mattheij's breakthrough was allowing the machine to effectively train itself, with guidance: Running pieces through allows the system to take its own photos, make a guess, and build on that guess. As long as Mattheij corrects the incorrect guesses, he ends up with a decent (and self-reinforcing) corpus of training data. As the machine continues running, it can rack up more training, allowing it to recognize a broad variety of pieces on the fly.

Here's another video, focusing on how the pieces move on conveyer belts (running at slow speed so puny humans can follow). You can also see the air jets in action:

In an email interview, Mattheij told Mental Floss that the system currently sorts LEGO bricks into more than 50 categories. It can also be run in a color-sorting mode to bin the parts across 12 color groups. (Thus at present you'd likely do a two-pass sort on the bricks: once for shape, then a separate pass for color.) He continues to refine the system, with a focus on making its recognition abilities faster. At some point down the line, he plans to make the software portion open source. You're on your own as far as building conveyer belts, bins, and so forth.

Check out Mattheij's writeup in two parts for more information. It starts with an overview of the story, followed up with a deep dive on the software. He's also tweeting about the project (among other things). And if you look around a bit, you'll find bulk LEGO brick auctions online—it's definitely a thing!

Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief
What Happened to Jamie and Aurelia From Love Actually?
May 26, 2017
Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief

Fans of the romantic-comedy Love Actually recently got a bonus reunion in the form of Red Nose Day Actually, a short charity special that gave audiences a peek at where their favorite characters ended up almost 15 years later.

One of the most improbable pairings from the original film was between Jamie (Colin Firth) and Aurelia (Lúcia Moniz), who fell in love despite almost no shared vocabulary. Jamie is English, and Aurelia is Portuguese, and they know just enough of each other’s native tongues for Jamie to propose and Aurelia to accept.

A decade and a half on, they have both improved their knowledge of each other’s languages—if not perfectly, in Jamie’s case. But apparently, their love is much stronger than his grasp on Portuguese grammar, because they’ve got three bilingual kids and another on the way. (And still enjoy having important romantic moments in the car.)

In 2015, Love Actually script editor Emma Freud revealed via Twitter what happened between Karen and Harry (Emma Thompson and Alan Rickman, who passed away last year). Most of the other couples get happy endings in the short—even if Hugh Grant's character hasn't gotten any better at dancing.

[h/t TV Guide]