Original image

On Music: the strings in Symphonie Fantastique

Original image

I'm thrilled at how you've already taken to the ON MUSIC feature! Lots of great comments yesterday, which I'll take into consideration going forward, especially the request to feature 20th century music.

Today I'm digging out the Berlioz, however. The most "romantic" of all the Romantics. Besides all the juicy love affairs and near love affairs, his attempts to kill himself and his outrageous hairdo, Berlioz was something of a rogue, getting into trouble often, causing a stir with his behavior as well as his seriously avante music. But the most interesting factoid I can drop about him, which you won't discover unless you do some serious reading about the genius (and let me recommend his autobiography if you're interested in learning more) is this: he couldn't play piano!

Berlioz was a guitarist and wrote most of his compositions sitting at a desk with nothing more than pen and staff paper. Pretty amazing, especially when you listen to how vivid and colorful his orchestrations are.

So let's do exactly that, by dropping in on the finale of his most famous piece, his Symphonie Fantastique. Yesterday we listened to several different handlings of the brass section, so I thought we'd do the same today, only in the string section.

In the beginning of this excerpt, note the nasally sound of the cellos and violas. This is accomplished by playing right near the bridge of the instrument, where the strings are tightest. Then, around 20 seconds in, the violins join the little canonic passage, only they're playing normally, which creates a nice juxtaposition against the raspy cellos. Moments later everyone is playing normally, creating that rich, full sound. But it gets even fuller at 40 seconds in when the whole string sections starts playing the tune in unison, deep and low down—listen to how rich and warm that is!When the brass come in with the counter melody a few moments later, the violins soar with the tune into the stratosphere. And then start diving up and down the scale.

Next comes my favorite part of all! At 1:15 into the excerpt, listen as the strings flip their bows upside down and start bouncing the wood side against the strings! In Italian, it's called col legno, and it means to strike "with the wood." String players hate to play col legno because the bows are very expensive and it ruins the wood. Some even carry extra bows, cheap ones, for moments in scores such as these. But what a great effect, eh? This piece, written around 1826, might very well be the first ever call for col legno.

Lastly, listen closely around 1:55 when the strings start a wild tremolo down in the lower register. This, combined with that scary rolling bass drum create the thunder-like effect you hear before the launch into the wonderfully bombastic finale.


Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva
Man Buys Two Metric Tons of LEGO Bricks; Sorts Them Via Machine Learning
May 21, 2017
Original image
iStock // Ekaterina Minaeva

Jacques Mattheij made a small, but awesome, mistake. He went on eBay one evening and bid on a bunch of bulk LEGO brick auctions, then went to sleep. Upon waking, he discovered that he was the high bidder on many, and was now the proud owner of two tons of LEGO bricks. (This is about 4400 pounds.) He wrote, "[L]esson 1: if you win almost all bids you are bidding too high."

Mattheij had noticed that bulk, unsorted bricks sell for something like €10/kilogram, whereas sets are roughly €40/kg and rare parts go for up to €100/kg. Much of the value of the bricks is in their sorting. If he could reduce the entropy of these bins of unsorted bricks, he could make a tidy profit. While many people do this work by hand, the problem is enormous—just the kind of challenge for a computer. Mattheij writes:

There are 38000+ shapes and there are 100+ possible shades of color (you can roughly tell how old someone is by asking them what lego colors they remember from their youth).

In the following months, Mattheij built a proof-of-concept sorting system using, of course, LEGO. He broke the problem down into a series of sub-problems (including "feeding LEGO reliably from a hopper is surprisingly hard," one of those facts of nature that will stymie even the best system design). After tinkering with the prototype at length, he expanded the system to a surprisingly complex system of conveyer belts (powered by a home treadmill), various pieces of cabinetry, and "copious quantities of crazy glue."

Here's a video showing the current system running at low speed:

The key part of the system was running the bricks past a camera paired with a computer running a neural net-based image classifier. That allows the computer (when sufficiently trained on brick images) to recognize bricks and thus categorize them by color, shape, or other parameters. Remember that as bricks pass by, they can be in any orientation, can be dirty, can even be stuck to other pieces. So having a flexible software system is key to recognizing—in a fraction of a second—what a given brick is, in order to sort it out. When a match is found, a jet of compressed air pops the piece off the conveyer belt and into a waiting bin.

After much experimentation, Mattheij rewrote the software (several times in fact) to accomplish a variety of basic tasks. At its core, the system takes images from a webcam and feeds them to a neural network to do the classification. Of course, the neural net needs to be "trained" by showing it lots of images, and telling it what those images represent. Mattheij's breakthrough was allowing the machine to effectively train itself, with guidance: Running pieces through allows the system to take its own photos, make a guess, and build on that guess. As long as Mattheij corrects the incorrect guesses, he ends up with a decent (and self-reinforcing) corpus of training data. As the machine continues running, it can rack up more training, allowing it to recognize a broad variety of pieces on the fly.

Here's another video, focusing on how the pieces move on conveyer belts (running at slow speed so puny humans can follow). You can also see the air jets in action:

In an email interview, Mattheij told Mental Floss that the system currently sorts LEGO bricks into more than 50 categories. It can also be run in a color-sorting mode to bin the parts across 12 color groups. (Thus at present you'd likely do a two-pass sort on the bricks: once for shape, then a separate pass for color.) He continues to refine the system, with a focus on making its recognition abilities faster. At some point down the line, he plans to make the software portion open source. You're on your own as far as building conveyer belts, bins, and so forth.

Check out Mattheij's writeup in two parts for more information. It starts with an overview of the story, followed up with a deep dive on the software. He's also tweeting about the project (among other things). And if you look around a bit, you'll find bulk LEGO brick auctions online—it's definitely a thing!

Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief
What Happened to Jamie and Aurelia From Love Actually?
May 26, 2017
Original image
Nick Briggs/Comic Relief

Fans of the romantic-comedy Love Actually recently got a bonus reunion in the form of Red Nose Day Actually, a short charity special that gave audiences a peek at where their favorite characters ended up almost 15 years later.

One of the most improbable pairings from the original film was between Jamie (Colin Firth) and Aurelia (Lúcia Moniz), who fell in love despite almost no shared vocabulary. Jamie is English, and Aurelia is Portuguese, and they know just enough of each other’s native tongues for Jamie to propose and Aurelia to accept.

A decade and a half on, they have both improved their knowledge of each other’s languages—if not perfectly, in Jamie’s case. But apparently, their love is much stronger than his grasp on Portuguese grammar, because they’ve got three bilingual kids and another on the way. (And still enjoy having important romantic moments in the car.)

In 2015, Love Actually script editor Emma Freud revealed via Twitter what happened between Karen and Harry (Emma Thompson and Alan Rickman, who passed away last year). Most of the other couples get happy endings in the short—even if Hugh Grant's character hasn't gotten any better at dancing.

[h/t TV Guide]