CLOSE
Getty Images
Getty Images

Do People Really Walk in Circles When They’re Lost?

Getty Images
Getty Images


It’s a reliable movie trope: Our heroes are lost in the woods, and in their valiant effort to make a beeline out of the forest or back to camp or civilization, they inevitably get turned around and wind up back at the same spot where they began.

When a science television show approached Jan Souman, a research scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, with a viewer’s question about the phenomenon, Souman wasn't sure if people actually did accidentally circle back. When lost, he thought, people would probably veer left or right randomly, but not actually circle back.

To find out, he and his research group gathered nine volunteers and stuck six of them in a German forest and the other three in the Tunisian desert. All of them were instructed to walk as straight as possible in one direction for several hours while wearing GPS receivers so that the researchers could analyze their routes.

Course Correction

Souman found that all of them eventually veered off course, and more than half did end up circling back to cross their own paths without realizing it. There was an interesting twist, though. The circling only happened with the four of the forest walkers who made their journeys in overcast conditions and the one desert walker who walked on a night with no visible moon. Those who could see the sun or moon managed to travel in straighter lines and, when they did lose their way, moved as Souman had predicted, veering left and right while generally going in the same direction and not crossing back on their route.

In a second experiment, the researchers had 15 volunteers try to walk in a straight line for an hour while blindfolded. When they couldn't see at all, the walkers circled back sooner, more often, and in tighter arcs, sometimes making a circle about the size of a basketball court.

The two experiments cast doubt on an older idea that this kind of disorientation comes from biomechanical asymmetries—like a differences in length or strength between the left and right legs—that create small but consistent directional bias. That would cause a person to consistently veer off in the same direction, especially when the person is blindfolded and without visual cues to compete with the bias. But only three of the walkers had a tendency to veer in one direction, while the others varied wildly in their circling, with their paths looking like a child had scribbled on a piece of paper. Walking in circles, Souman and his team think, isn’t caused by some physical bias, but an uncertainty about where straight ahead lies that increases over time.

Visual Clues

For the walkers in the first experiment, visual cues appeared to be very important. Those who could see some external reference point—the sun, the moon, a hill in the far distance—could use it to recalibrate their sense of direction and maintain a relatively straight path. (Interestingly, Souman notes that the volunteers in the first experiment walked for several hours, during which the sun moved about 50 to 60 degrees; rather than following a correspondingly bent path, they were able to correct for this, even if subconsciously.)

The volunteers who walked when it was cloudy or dark or while they were blindfolded didn’t have this luxury and walked in circles. Without a reference point to maintain their course, these subjects had to rely on other cues, like sounds and information from the vestibular system, which aids in movement, balance and spatial orientation. Small random mistakes in the processing of these cues, Souman and team think, add up over time, especially when the senses are limited. Eventually, the internal compass fails and “random changes in the subjective sense of straight ahead” lead a person off the straight and narrow path and right back where they started from.

nextArticle.image_alt|e
Jack Taylor, Getty Images
arrow
Big Questions
How Are Royal Babies Named?
Jack Taylor, Getty Images
Jack Taylor, Getty Images

After much anticipation, England's royal family has finally received a tiny new addition. The birth of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge's second son was confirmed by Kensington Palace on April 23, but the name of the royal newborn has yet to be announced. For the heir to the British throne and his wife, choosing a name for their third child—who is already fifth in line to the throne—likely won't be as easy as flipping through a baby name book; it's tradition for royals to select names that honor important figures from British history.

According to ABC WJLA, selecting three or four names is typical when naming a royal baby. Will and Kate followed this unwritten rule when naming their first child, George Alexander Louis, and their second, Charlotte Elizabeth Diana. Each name is an opportunity to pay homage to a different British royal who came before them. Some royal monikers have less savory connotations (Prince Harry's given name, Henry, is reminiscent of a certain wife-beheading monarch), but typically royal babies are named for people who held a significant and honorable spot in the family tree.

Because there's a limited pool of honorable monarchs from which to choose, placing bets on the royal baby name as the due date approaches has become a popular British pastime. One name that keeps cropping up this time around is James; the original King James ruled in the early 17th century, and it has been 330 years since a monarch named James wore the crown.

If the royal family does go with James for the first name of their youngest son, that still leaves at least a couple of slots to be filled. So far, the couple has stuck with three names each for their children, but there doesn't seem to be a limit; Edward VIII, who abdicated the throne to George VI in 1936, shouldered the full name of Edward Albert Christian George Andrew Patrick David.

Have you got a Big Question you'd like us to answer? If so, let us know by emailing us at bigquestions@mentalfloss.com.

nextArticle.image_alt|e
CHRIS JACKSON, AFP/Getty Images
arrow
Big Questions
Why Does the Queen Have Two Birthdays?
CHRIS JACKSON, AFP/Getty Images
CHRIS JACKSON, AFP/Getty Images

On April 21, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will turn 92 years old. To mark the occasion, there are usually a series of gun salutes around London: a 41 gun salute in Hyde Park, a 21 gun salute in Windsor Great Park, and a 62 gun salute at the Tower of London. For the most part, the monarch celebrates her big day privately. But on June 9, 2018, Her Majesty will parade through London as part of an opulent birthday celebration known as Trooping the Colour.

Queen Elizabeth, like many British monarchs before her, has two birthdays: the actual anniversary of the day she was born, and a separate day that is labeled her "official" birthday (usually the second Saturday in June). Why? Because April 21 is usually too cold for a proper parade.

The tradition started in 1748, with King George II, who had the misfortune of being born in chilly November. Rather than have his subjects risk catching colds, he combined his birthday celebration with the Trooping the Colour.

The parade itself had been part of British culture for almost a century by that time. At first it was strictly a military event, at which regiments displayed their flags—or "colours"—so that soldiers could familiarize themselves. But George was known as a formidable general after having led troops at the Battle of Dettingen in 1743, so the military celebration seemed a fitting occasion onto which to graft his warm-weather birthday. Edward VII, who also had a November birthday, was the first to standardize the June Trooping the Colour and launched a tradition of a monarchical review of the troops that drew crowds of onlookers.

Even now, the date of the "official" birthday varies year to year. For the first seven years of her reign, Elizabeth II held her official birthday on a Thursday but has since switched over to Saturdays. And while the date is tied to the Trooping the Colour in the UK, Commonwealth nations around the world have their own criteria, which generally involve recognizing it as a public holiday.

Australia started recognizing an official birthday back in 1788, and all the provinces (save one) observe the Queen's Birthday on the second Monday in June, with Western Australia holding its celebrations on the last Monday of September or the first Monday of October.

In Canada, the official birthday has been set to align with the actual birth date of Queen Victoria—May 24, 1819—since 1845, and as such they celebrate so-called Victoria Day on May 24 or the Monday before.

In New Zealand, it's the first Monday in June, and in the Falkland Islands the actual day of the Queen's birth is celebrated publicly.

All in all, just another reason it's great to be Queen.

Have you got a Big Question you'd like us to answer? If so, let us know by emailing us at bigquestions@mentalfloss.com.

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER
More from mental floss studios